Bone Plate,Bone Plates, Internal Fixation Devices,
Bone Plate,Bone Plates, Internal Fixation Devices,

Bone plates are metallic implants that stabilise fractured bones during the healing process. They function as internal splints, secured to bone with screws.

These devices provide rigid support against bending, shearing, and rotational forces, maintaining proper alignment whilst natural callus formation occurs. The plates transfer loads across the fracture site, creating optimal conditions for bone regeneration.

1. Contouring

Surgeon shapes the metallic plate to match the bone’s anatomical profile for precise fit.

2. Positioning

Plate is positioned to bridge the fracture site, aligning broken bone segments accurately.

3. Fixation

Multiple screws secure the plate firmly to healthy bone on both sides of the fracture.

4. Load Transfer

Device bears mechanical forces whilst natural bone callus forms and strengthens over time.

5. Healing

Bone regenerates under stable conditions; plate may require surgical removal post-healing.

1. Non-Spinal Plates Guidance

Orthopaedic Non-Spinal Bone Plates, Screws, and Washers – Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions

Updated November 2024 for Industry and FDA Staff

2. Performance Pathway

Orthopaedic Fracture Fixation Plates – Performance Criteria for Safety and Performance Based Pathway

Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff addressing performance requirements

These guidances provide comprehensive frameworks for demonstrating substantial equivalence and meeting performance criteria for bone plate submissions

Titanium-6Aluminium-4Vanadium alloy for surgical implants

Stainless steel bar and wire for surgical implants

Wrought cobalt alloys for surgical implants

Unalloyed titanium for surgical implant applications

These standards specify chemical composition, mechanical properties, and biocompatibility requirements for implant-grade materials used in bone plate manufacturing.

Plate TestingScrew Testing
ASTM F382: Static bending strengthASTM F543: Comprehensive screw testing including drive torque, axial pull-out, and self-tapping performance
ASTM F384: Dynamic fatigue resistance 
ASTM F3437: Locking mechanism performance 
ISO 9585: Mechanical testing protocols 
Bone Plate,Bone Plates, Internal Fixation Devices,

These standards ensure devices withstand physiological loads throughout the healing period, typically 3-6 months under cyclic loading conditions.

EU MDR Classification

Class llb

Long-term surgically invasive implant under Rule 8 Duration exceeding 30 days in body, requiring conformity assessment via Notified Body route.

FDA Classification

Class II

Typically under Orthopaedic Panel Various product codes; requires 510(k) premarket notification demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices.

Important: Final classification depends on intended purpose, duration of use, invasiveness, and whether device is active. Always reference Annex VIII + MDCG 2021-24 guidance

1. Standards Scope Review

Carefully review applicability of each standard to your specific device configuration, material selection, and intended use before claiming conformity.

2. Classification Anchoring

EU classification cites Annex VIII rules, but final determination requires assessment of intended purpose, contact duration, invasiveness level, and active/non-active status per MDCG 2021-24.

3. Predicate Selection

For FDA 510(k) pathway, identify appropriate predicate devices with similar technological characteristics, intended use, and performance specifications.

1. Standards Sanity Check

Verification that selected standards appropriately cover your device scope and testing requirements

2. GSPR Documentation

Pre-filled General Safety and Performance Requirements tailored to your bone plate specifications

3. Risk Management File

Comprehensive ISO 14971 compliant risk analysis and management documentation

4. Clinical Evaluation Report

CER development meeting MDR Annex XIV requirements with appropriate clinical data

5. Predicate Device Selection

Identification and analysis of suitable predicates for your 510(k) submission strategy

6. PMCF Survey

Post-Market Clinical Follow-up study design and implementation for ongoing surveillance

Whether you’re preparing a 510(k) submission or pursuing EU MDR compliance, expert guidance ensures efficient regulatory approval.

Contact us today: Drop us an email or send a direct message to discuss your regulatory strategy.

Found this helpful? Share this carousel with your regulatory affairs network and tag someone who needs this guidance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *